ACN Volume 4 No 2-3 Spring 1992 Interview with Staff Member Michael Hauben on the Occasion of the 10th Anniversary of the Personal Computer Part I (Editor's Note: This interview was conducted on August 11, 1991. It has been edited.) Ronda: Tomorrow is the 10th anniversary of the introduction of the IBM personal computer on August 12, 1981. Also, one of our staff members, Michael Hauben, is leaving Michigan to go to college in N.Y. Therefore, it seemed an appropriate time to look back on the past 10 years and to review how the introduction of the personal computer has affected our lives. Michael is now 18. In 1981 he was 8 years old and already involved with computers. Michael is not only one of the beneficiaries of the computer revolution. The computer revolution was carried out, not so much by companies like IBM, but more importantly, by computer hobbyists like Michael Hauben. Thus in honor of the computer hobbyists, who gave birth to and developed the personal computer, we would like to review some of your experiences, Michael, with the computer. William: How did you get started with computers? Michael: The first place I really saw computers was at an exhibit in Toronto over 10 years ago. There was a robot that was like the 4 axes machine that auto workers use. They also had a computer exhibit. I don't remember what kind of computer was on display but they were just a bunch of computers running different kinds of programs set up there at the Canadian National Exhibit. That really peaked my interest somehow. When I was 8 (in 1981), I took a computer class at Schoolcraft Community College, in what was called the Kids College. It was part of what they called the TAG (Talented and Gifted) Program. The teacher's name was Mrs. Brown. We learned on the Apple II+'s. The first day of class, Mrs. Brown lifted the top of the APPLE and said, "There, that's all there is to it, There's nothing to be afraid of." That was a very good introduction to the computer because it showed there was nothing to be afraid of. That we could completely control it. I learned BASIC there. I took several other classes in that program. I think I took three. I didn't take all the BASIC language classes offered. But I took a test that they had for their normal BASIC college level classes and I wound up getting three college credits for the BASIC language class. And I didn't do so good because I ended up only getting a B on the test. But the experience was interesting and from then on whenever there was a computer available I tried to use it. After the trip to Toronto, I always wanted to buy a computer. There was the Texas Instruments 99/4a (TI 99/4a) and I don't remember how much it cost, but it was expensive. There was the Timex Sinclair 1000 (TS 1000) and that was much cheaper. My family and I had seen Sinclair computers in England when we visited. These computers could be hooked up to a normal t.v. set. I saved up my money and bought a TS-1000. Using it I more thoroughly learned BASIC. My father and I programmed a lot in BASIC with only 2K memory. We never seemed to run out of memory. We just played around and tried to do lots of different things, tried writing little games, graphics and we dabbled a little in machine language, not a lot however. Whenever I had the chance, whether it was summer camp or in a computer store, I'd try to do something with the computer. I learned BASIC, I learned LOGO on the TI-99/4a in Camp, and I played around with APPLES and with Commodore PETS. In my elementary school, there was a terminal hooked in with the mainframe of the Dearborn Schools. At that time there were many programs on the mainframe. They had BASIC. They had games like the OREGON TRAIL, etc. I subscribed to two or three magazines for the TS-1000. I bought books, did all the TRY THIS type of small programs. Those were always fun because there would always be problems with the programs. There would always be bugs. The books and sample programs were exciting somehow. I haven't found many books similar for programming on the IBM PCs today, books that I have found exciting for a hobbyist. And this is sad. Soon after I bought the TS-1000, it couldn't have been more than a couple of years, I was trying to choose between the TS-2068 and the Commodore 64. I think the Commodore was more expensive. The TS-2068 had better color, and a more developed version of BASIC. The Commodore 64 was better in that it had a disk drive and the TS-1000 only had a tape drive you could use. The Commodore also had a real keyboard, while the Timex utilized raised chicklet keys. I bought the TS-2068. Then I had my first real lesson in the computer world. Three months after I bought the TS-2068, Timex stopped selling it and supporting it. Timex made a deal with Commodore. There was an agreement to sell the Sinclair in England and Europe and Commodore in the United States. That was a shock because I thought I made a better choice, but it turned out the better deal is not always the best choice. And my father and I did programming on that, but not really as much as we did on the TS-1000. It was a lot less, even though there was the added attraction of the color and the sound and the joystick port. And so I still did things and I tried to pick up on things whenever I could. Christmas of 1984, we bought a Sanyo MBC-550-2 which was a MS-DOS compatible, but not an IBM compatible, machine. The operating system was IBM compatible, but the graphics were different, the sound was different, and the BASIC was different. The Sanyo was a better machine for graphics, I think 640 x 400 with 4 colors if not 16. And WordStar worked. That's why my family got it as a wordprocessor. I learned MS-Dos. I got more into the PC world. We subscribed to a Sanyo magazine for a while. We went to the Sanyo Users' groups for a while. We occasionally went to SEMCO (Southeast Michigan Computer Organization), but somehow that was already oriented toward business and they weren't very interested in helping us. Then in 1985, through INACOMP, my mother won a Compaq Portable. It was one of the earliest to come out that was fully IBM compatible. It was a luggable portable, and it weighed about 20 pounds, if not more. And that's how I really got into IBM. We had a choice between a modem and a hard drive. We got a modem. It was a breakthrough. The hard drive seemed important but the modem was more important. We wound up getting a hard drive later on. With the modem, it lets you connect to the outside world. With your own little system you'd be like a hermit, but in connecting with the rest of the world, it's other people's opinions, different discussions about computers, about current events, debates about what's going on in the world and just general BS also. And you came into contact with people, you came into contact with different files to use with your computer, with what was going on with the computer scene and so somehow it was like a replacement for a user group. And depending upon the time, there was either a lot going on or a little going on. Ronda: What do you mean? Michael: Well right now not many boards I know have much debate on them. There are two that I am on. Both of them have debates on-going. I'm sure there are others, but I just haven't had time to look. But for a while I was on many of the boards and at one point many of the boards were silly contests to see who could post the most numerous messages. Ronda: Do you have a sense what you were looking for on the BBS's? You used to spend a lot of time on them. Michael: Well at first I wasn't on local BBS's. Originally, I was on COMPUSERVE. William: Free time? Michael: Well, the first two hours were free. I almost became a beta-tester for Infocom through COMPUSERVE. I sent in the application forms. I then received a congratulations letter, but Infocom never sent me any games to test. The only response was a Christmas card. That was a soured Compuserve memory. I found some local BBS numbers listed on Compuserve and from my father and some friends of his from work. For a while I was mostly on Commodore BBS's and not many IBM boards. But then I started calling the IBM boards. It was new for me when I started. Modeming was a connection to the outside world to other people with similar interests. It was interesting the debates about current events. Somehow there was the possibility for intellectual discussion which I couldn't find elsewhere besides my parents and a few friends like Floyd Hoke-Miller. But among my friends at school or neighbors, there wasn't much of a possibility. When we lived in East Dearborn, our next door neighbor, Tom, had an Atari and a Commodore 64. He shared an interest in computers with me. He was my friend, even though there was a large age gap, because we were both interested in computers. He let me come over and try some things on his computer and I'd go with him to computer stores. William: Another thing about modems you can't tell the age. Treats you more like an equal. Michael: There's an anonymity. You don't know anything about the other users. So you are more willing to accept them. There are still first impressions. If you act like a real idiot, people won't like you. But the full element of first impressions is left out. And people tend to rank you or be friends with you on how you act on-line, what you speak about. It does help. You tend to get to know the people and there isn't as much blocking. And my first handle was Wizkid. I changed my handle 2 or 3 years ago to Sentinel. And there was one person who signed on and said it was great knowing you. He was one of the people who knew me as Wizkid. There was a "Remembering the OLD Days" theme area on one of the BBS's and someone said, "remember that Wizkid." And I said, "that was me." And he said he didn't know that. When people change their handles, it's public but somehow people don't always realize it. When I changed my handle, I decreased my activity. When I decreased my activity it was because there were just silly messages that didn't mean anything, or they just seemed juvenile, and I don't know if that's because the people calling were younger or they were more juvenile. The way people accept you is based on your maturity on-line and your maturity showed through more than your age. And there was one debate where someone said you are just a kid. And I used to have the handle Wizkid. But it didn't matter what your age was, it was more how mature you were. He was trying to say "Well you're just a kid, you can't know anything." But he was wrong. So there is less age discrimination on the boards. Ronda: Why did you decrease the time you spent on the boards? Michael: I had to spend more time with school, with friends, with my job. Whenever I used to come home from school, I used to spend 2 or 3 hours, but then my mom said, "We need the phone." So I didn't spend my free time before homework on the modem. And then with work, I wasn't even home on certain days to use the modem. Ronda: But it seemed you were also a little disappointed. There were user parties, but it seemed the computer world didn't extend outside of the modem. Michael: It did to a certain extent, but it didn't include everyone. Like some people were friends before. There were modem parties where people from the boards got together, whether it was a software swap or a party. Ronda: There weren't many, were there? Michael: Well, what happened was the main person who had the parties was from a TAG board in Taylor. He had his computer stolen after the 2nd or 3rd party. So he stopped holding them. Then there were multiuser boards. There was M-Net which was a multi-user. The general ages of the users on M-Net was older than on the other single-user BBS's. And it was more serious. It was more a UNIX board. It was a different bunch. It was not the home but the people in school, in Ann Arbor. It seemed like the multi-user boards made it easier to hold parties because users could chat live one-on-one. And when AMUSERS (a multi-user board) closed down, I didn't get on other multi-users that were like AMUSERS. Some people already were friends but you didn't end up doing much so it was a little disappointing. Cause it didn't seem like there was any it didn't get anywhere it was just on-line so that was a little disconcerting. It was disappointing because that was where I had found more intellectual people but it didn't go anywhere. And things like COMPUSERVE cost a lot of money. There's COMPUSERVE, there's Delphi, there's Geni, there's PC Link, there's Q-link, there's a couple of services but they all cost money, so that's hard to deal with. And then there are bigger boards that exist. But they all cost money. There's the WELL. That's in California. You also pay per hour like Compuserve. So it's harder to be on. It's like M-Net. It's the same software as M-Net. And maybe I did find it disappointing. It used to be there would be lots of new BBS's popping up. But they were interesting. And now there still are lots of new BBS's popping up. But they're silly. So it's gone downhill a little bit. And also BBS's are similar to the CB or the Ham radio in that people voice their opinions, or have discussions or chat or there used to be DDial's all they were were multi-user, people chatting, but they were 300 baud so they were super slow. Some of those you had to acquire membership. But they were linked up across the country. There were things called LINKS that would connect you to other DDial's around the country. So that way you could talk to people. Somehow the thing about BBS's was it was the ultimate vehicle of Free Speech, uncensored speech. For the most part things were not censored. What you posted was left alone. It was like everyone's Letter to the Editor was allowed to be printed. There would be letters debating other previous letters. Different SysOps had different rules and some would delete messages that contained profanity or were only personal attacks or something. BBS's are the greatest form of free speech. The problem was you needed a modem and a computer to get into it. So it's not as free as it might be, but compared to the newspapers, the newspapers print what they choose, whereas on BBS's everything is printed, everything is published. It's more of a dynamic medium than a static medium because depending on the board there's different forms of dealing with messages. For example, some boards after the first 50 messages go by, the first message is deleted, so it's a dynamic thing. Unless somebody prints out a copy or saves it to disk, it doesn't stay static. Like on M-Net, things aren't deleted. They are deleted when the message SysOp of the area decides no one is interested anymore. That's more of a choice method of deletion, than where it deletes messages or the new one pops in, the old one pops out and it's deleted. And even depending on what happens, it's still an important medium. There was, for example, just a debate about the war against IRAQ on BBS's. Usually you didn't see where there was dissent. Whereas on the computer, if people wanted to, they could debate it and there was debate about it. A free medium. It's open access. Not closed. It's also a field where the hobbyist still exists. There are people who develop ways of using the modem, whether it's different compression techniques where you can send more and larger files quicker, or whether it's different file protocols that send them faster over phone lines. Those are constantly developing. That is a hobbyist frontier now. Maybe there are less people than when the computer started out. But it still exists. It's a frontier that's not closed up yet. It's not definite yet. New things are continuing to come out. For example, higher speed chips for the serial ports in the computer so that the computer can talk to the modem at a higher speed and everything. ---------------- end of part 1 ------------------------------- Part 2 can be seen at: http://www.ais.org/~hauben/Michael_Hauben/Collected_Works/Amateur_Computerist/Interview_with_Staff_Member2.txt The whole interview as a single file can be see at: http://www.ais.org/~hauben/Michael_Hauben/Collected_Works/Amateur_Computerist/Interview_with_Staff_Member.txt ===============================================================